OPAC (Online Public Access Catalog)
Collection Search
start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject
Can the oriental know justice? Can the subaltern tell stories?
osef Gregory Mahoney - Personal Name
In response to the contemporary American philosopher Michael J. Sandel’s
tremendous popularity and ongoing engagements with Chinese philosophy,
which are often offered as evidence of a deep resonance between his work and
contemporary Chinese interests in justice, I argue that his conception of justice as a
product of the storyteller’s narrative quest encounters two potential problems when
considered from a Chinese perspective. The first is whether ‘‘Chinese’’ justice—
which can be viewed substantially as a collective if not individual attempt to
overcome subalternity as the Oriental subject—can be achieved through the foreign
forms of moral reasoning that are perhaps guilty of consigning Chinese to their
status as Orientals in the first place. The second questions whether the Western
culture of storytelling, of the heroic subject who conquers the other (so often the
Oriental in modern times), is not already a product and producer of injustice, and in
its contemporary forms, a fantasy and fetish of capitalist society that is not only
incapable of individual justice, but also complicit in injustices towards others. These
points are raised in tandem with discussions of ongoing generational shifts in China
largely attributable to the rapid expansion of a market economy and the growing
normalization of Western-style heroic, justice seeking storyteller, which might in
turn legitimize Sandel’s approach to justice. However, from a Marxist perspective, I
argue that such developments might be Trojan horses for new forms of subjugation,
alienation, and inauthentic being—in short, contra Western Orientalist universalism,
the very injustices that China’s modernity project has aimed to overcome and with
which it risks assimilation.
tremendous popularity and ongoing engagements with Chinese philosophy,
which are often offered as evidence of a deep resonance between his work and
contemporary Chinese interests in justice, I argue that his conception of justice as a
product of the storyteller’s narrative quest encounters two potential problems when
considered from a Chinese perspective. The first is whether ‘‘Chinese’’ justice—
which can be viewed substantially as a collective if not individual attempt to
overcome subalternity as the Oriental subject—can be achieved through the foreign
forms of moral reasoning that are perhaps guilty of consigning Chinese to their
status as Orientals in the first place. The second questions whether the Western
culture of storytelling, of the heroic subject who conquers the other (so often the
Oriental in modern times), is not already a product and producer of injustice, and in
its contemporary forms, a fantasy and fetish of capitalist society that is not only
incapable of individual justice, but also complicit in injustices towards others. These
points are raised in tandem with discussions of ongoing generational shifts in China
largely attributable to the rapid expansion of a market economy and the growing
normalization of Western-style heroic, justice seeking storyteller, which might in
turn legitimize Sandel’s approach to justice. However, from a Marxist perspective, I
argue that such developments might be Trojan horses for new forms of subjugation,
alienation, and inauthentic being—in short, contra Western Orientalist universalism,
the very injustices that China’s modernity project has aimed to overcome and with
which it risks assimilation.
Availability
| EB00000002827K | Available |
Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
-
Publisher
: ,
Collation
-
Language
ISBN/ISSN
-
Classification
NONE
Detail Information
Content Type
E-Jurnal
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
-
No other version available
File Attachment
